ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Comparison of multivariate linear regression and random forest model in developing mandibular chin prediction reconstruction equation.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeReconstruction of extensive mandibular defects that cross midline is technically challenging, as the surgeons lack normal anatomical references. This study aims to compare multivariate linear regression and machine learning (random forest) algorithms in predicting the premorbid shape of the mandibular chin to guide surgical reconstruction.
methodsAnatomical landmarks and measurements were extracted from the computed tomography (CT) data of the head. The multivariate regression model was developed based on Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), while the dataset was randomly split into training set (80%) and testing set (20%) to develop a machine learning-based algorithm.
resultsCorrelation was observed among the maxillary intercanine distance, distance of bilateral zygoma, width of piriform aperture and the width of chin in multivariate linear regression model, and satisfactory performance was achieved, (MAE (2.35), R² (0.25)). No significant difference was noted between the predicted width of chin and actual measurement in paired t-test. (P = 0.092) Bootstrap validation with 500 repetitions demonstrated stable performance (MAE 2.45 mm; R² = 0.17). Machine learning models using the same predictors did not improve predictive accuracy.
conclusionBoth models demonstrated comparable accuracy in predicting chin width; however, the multivariate regression model achieved lower prediction error compared with machine learning approaches using the same predictors. The interpretability and simplicity of multivariate linear regression may make it more clinically practical for reconstructing midline mandibular defects. A straightforward regression model can provide surgeons with a reliable, accessible tool for preoperative planning in complex mandibular reconstructions, especially where advanced computational resources are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42809024What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.