ArticleLasers in medical science2026
The effectiveness of lasers in treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity, a scoping review on lasers parametes and clinical protocols.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical application of laser therapy has emerged as an effective therapeutic modality for managing dentin hypersensitivity (DH). This scoping review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various laser types in treating DH, summarize tooth preparation protocols (pre-,intra-, and post-laser therapy), and analyze optimal laser parameters.
methodsThe electronic database (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus) were searched for English-language studies published between January 2010 and October 2025. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by independent observers.
resultsOut of 765 identified articles, 59 were initially screened, and 25 met the final eligibility criteria. Our findings confirm the clinical efficacy of various laser modalities in mitigating DH. While some studies reported no significant superiority of lasers over conventional desensitizing agents or placebos, the majority suggested that combined modalities yielded superior results, characterized by both rapid onset and long-term stability. Specifically, the application of low-level diode lasers (630-980 nm), Er:Cr:YSGG lasers (at power settings of 0.25 or 0.5 W), and high-power Nd:YAG lasers were identified as effective therapeutic approaches.
conclusionBoth high-power and low-power lasers, including diode lasers at various wavelengths, and different laser parameters are capable of alleviating DH when utilized with optimized output settings. Furthermore, the synergistic use of chemical desensitizing agents in conjunction with laser therapy, particularly low-power lasers, represents a highly effective clinical strategy for the management of DH. Tooth preparation protocols pre-, intra-, and post-laser therapy must be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.