Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809004›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2026

Safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and other new-generation glucose-lowering agents for the management of type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: a French nationwide population-based study.

Mathis Collier, Laurent Chouchana, Florentia Kaguelidou, Jean-Marc Treluyer, Anick Bérard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathis CollierUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, UMR-S 1343 Pharmacologie et évaluations des thérapeutiques chez l'enfant et la femme enceinte, F-75006, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2398-0396
Laurent ChouchanaUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, UMR-S 1343 Pharmacologie et évaluations des thérapeutiques chez l'enfant et la femme enceinte, F-75006, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-3571
Florentia KaguelidouUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, UMR-S 1343 Pharmacologie et évaluations des thérapeutiques chez l'enfant et la femme enceinte, F-75006, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7842-5602
Jean-Marc TreluyerUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, UMR-S 1343 Pharmacologie et évaluations des thérapeutiques chez l'enfant et la femme enceinte, F-75006, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-4742
Anick BérardUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm, UMR-S 1343 Pharmacologie et évaluations des thérapeutiques chez l'enfant et la femme enceinte, F-75006, Paris, France. anick.berard@u-paris.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-5517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and other second-line glucose-lowering agents are increasingly used among women of reproductive age. Data on the safety of these medications in pregnancy are limited. We aimed to assess the comparative safety of first-trimester exposure to second-line glucose-lowering agents on the risk of organ-specific congenital malformations among pregnancies affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus that was pharmacologically treated.

methodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study using the French National Health Data System including singleton infants born after pregnancies lasting more than 22 weeks, in women aged 18 to 50 years with pregestational, pharmacologically treated type 2 diabetes from January 2011 to August 2024. We defined first-trimester exposure to glucose-lowering agents as having at least one prescription filled from 30 days before through to 91 days after conception. All glucose-lowering agents were considered: insulin, metformin, GLP-1RA, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), sulfonylureas and other glucose-lowering agents. The primary reference group was the use of insulin alone, but the use of metformin, with and without insulin, and non-use of glucose-lowering agents were also comparators in additional analyses to facilitate comparison with previous studies. Analysed outcomes were major congenital malformations during the delivery stay and up to 1 year after birth to consider delayed identification, using ICD-10 codes as per EUROCAT (European surveillance of congenital anomalies) guidelines. Adjusted RRs and 95% CIs were estimated using Poisson regressions with generalised estimating equations. Values of BMI and HbA

resultsAmong 19,092 eligible pregnancies, 17.5% were exposed to insulin alone, 34.7% to at least one second-line glucose-lowering agent and 10.4% were unexposed to any glucose-lowering agent during the first trimester. Compared with insulin-only use, first-trimester exposure to second-line glucose-lowering agents was not associated with an increased risk of overall or organ-specific major congenital malformations. Sensitivity analyses using stricter exposure definitions suggested a possible small increased risk of cardiac malformations following first-trimester exposure to GLP-1 RA and sulfonylureas. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationIn this largest study to date on the use of glucose-lowering agents in pregnancy, first-trimester exposure to second-line glucose-lowering agents was not associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations when compared with insulin-only use. However, a small increased risk of cardiac defects associated with first-trimester exposure to GLP-1RA and sulfonylureas is possible, and thus teratogenicity cannot be excluded.

Indexed as

French SNDS dataGLP-1RAMajor congenital malformationsNew-generation glucose-lowering agentsPregnancyType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.