ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026
Growth, Carcass Quality and Gut Microbiota Responses to Extruded Rapeseed Meal With Protease in Broiler Chickens.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSoybean meal (SBM) is a major protein source in broiler diets, but its cost and dependence on a limited number of protein sources have increased interest in alternative feed ingredients. Rapeseed meal has considerable potential as an alternative protein source; however, its utilisation is constrained by antinutritional factors that can limit nutrient availability and broiler performance. Extrusion processing and exogenous enzyme supplementation may improve the nutritional value of rapeseed meal. We hypothesised that replacing part of dietary SBM with extruded rapeseed meal (ERSM), in combination with protease and non-starch polysaccharide (NSP)-degrading enzymes, would improve or maintain broiler performance and nutrient utilisation while supporting intestinal health.
methodsA total of 320 day-old Ross 308 male broiler chickens were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments in a completely randomised design. During the finisher period (22-35 days), birds received a corn-SBM control diet or diets in which 5%, 7.5%, or 10% of SBM protein was replaced with ERSM. All diets contained identical levels of protease and NSP-degrading enzymes. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass characteristics, intestinal morphology and caecal microbial populations were evaluated to determine the effects of increasing ERSM inclusion.
resultsDietary ERSM affected feed intake (p = 0.029), final body weight (p = 0.017), feed conversion ratio (p = 0.009) and mortality (p = 0.041), with the 5% and 7.5% ERSM treatments generally producing the most favourable performance. Apparent digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, crude fibre, fat and ash was improved in ERSM-fed birds (p < 0.05). Carcass yield, breast weight and thigh weight increased with ERSM inclusion (p ≤ 0.025), whereas liver weight decreased at the highest inclusion level (p = 0.034). ERSM also improved intestinal morphology by increasing villus height and the villus height-to-crypt depth ratio and reducing crypt depth (p ≤ 0.016). In addition, ERSM increased beneficial caecal bacterial populations and reduced Escherichia coli and Clostridium counts (p ≤ 0.050).
conclusionsReplacing SBM protein with 5%-7.5% ERSM in diets supplemented with protease and NSP-degrading enzymes improved growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass characteristics, intestinal morphology and caecal microbial balance in broilers. The findings indicate that appropriately processed rapeseed meal can partially substitute for SBM while maintaining or improving important productive and intestinal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.