ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
Models of Care for Mental Health Nurse Practitioners in Emergency Department Settings: A Scoping Review Across High-Income Countries.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review examined and synthesised existing literature on models of care involving Mental Health Nurse Practitioners (MHNPs) practising or consulting within Emergency Department (ED)-based Emergency Mental Health (EMH) services. EDs are a key access point for mental health care and often provide first contact or after-hours support for people experiencing crisis, reinforcing their central role within the mental health system. The review highlights the need for timely, safe and specialised mental health care within EDs to strengthen the quality, safety and responsiveness of EMH services. Given the limited ED-specific MHNP literature, studies involving related advanced mental health nursing roles were also included where functions overlapped with MHNP practice, although these roles were not considered equivalent. Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework, 13 ED-specific studies were included: two quantitative, two qualitative, five mixed-methods, three realist or realist-informed evaluations and one descriptive or pilot service evaluation. Three themes were identified: consumer outcomes and timely access to care; MHNP roles within ED service models; and stakeholder perspectives and systemic challenges. Across studies, MHNPs and related advanced mental health nursing roles were associated with improved access to specialist assessment, enhanced care coordination, reduced psychological distress and high consumer and staff satisfaction. However, evidence was largely derived from early-stage, single-site evaluations. Barriers relating to role visibility and organisational support also limited sustainability. Overall, MHNP roles remain under-researched, highlighting the need to identify system-level enablers supporting effective integration and impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.