SynthesisJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2026
Clinical, economic, and quality-of-life outcomes of brexucabtagene autoleucel for the treatment of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), a CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, has shown efficacy in clinical trials for relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, although effectiveness and safety evidence is well established, real-world evidence (RWE) on health care resource use (HCRU), costs, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains limited.
objectiveTo systematically review and synthesize RWE on clinical, HCRU, and cost outcomes, and both RWE and trial evidence on HRQoL, for brexu-cel in adults with R/R MCL and B-ALL.
methodsSystematic searches were conducted to identify studies reporting outcomes for adults with R/R MCL and B-ALL treated with brexu-cel. RWE was included for clinical, HCRU, and costs outcomes, and HRQoL outcomes. Effectiveness and safety were analyzed using meta-analysis, while HCRU, cost, and HRQoL were summarized descriptively.
results69 publications representing 31 cohorts were identified (19 MCL, 7 B-ALL, 3 mixed). Pooled overall response and complete response rates in MCL were 88% and 76%, while B-ALL showed complete response and measurable residual disease negativity of 74% and 73%, consistent with pivotal trials ZUMA-2 and ZUMA-3, respectively. Median overall survival was 40.3 months in MCL and 23.3 months in B-ALL. Cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were the most common adverse events; severe events were less frequent in real-world cohorts compared with trials, potentially reflecting advances in safety management and earlier identification of toxicities. HCRU and cost evidence was limited; 1 MCL study reported reduced post-chimeric antigen receptor T costs. No real-world HRQoL data were identified.
conclusionsBrexu-cel provides substantial and durable benefit in R/R MCL and B-ALL, with real-world effectiveness and safety consistent with pivotal trials. However, evidence gaps remain for HRQoL and economic outcomes, underscoring priorities for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.