ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2026
Association between cachexia-associated diagnoses, health care resource utilization, and costs in patients with pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancers: A US insurance claims database analysis.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer cachexia is a wasting disease characterized by changes in metabolism, muscle and weight loss, inadequate food intake, and functional decline. The disease affects 30%-50% of patients with solid tumors. There is limited literature describing the relationship between cachexia and health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs in the United States.
objectiveTo compare the HRU and direct health plan costs for patients with colorectal, lung, and pancreatic cancer with and without a cachexia-associated diagnosis.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in Merative MarketScan commercial and Medicare claims databases. Patients with cachexia-associated diagnoses were identified following a colorectal, lung, or pancreatic cancer diagnosis between October 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. Patients without a cachexia-associated diagnosis were propensity score-matched 2:1 to patients with a cachexia-associated diagnosis. Average 1-year HRU and direct health plan costs were calculated using a modified Kaplan-Meier sample average approach to account for patients lost to follow-up before the end of the 1-year observation period. The significance of group differences was assessed by nonoverlapping bootstrap 95% CIs.
resultsThe matched sample included 10,445 patients with a cachexia-associated diagnosis and 20,890 without across colorectal, lung, and pancreatic cancers. One-year health care costs were significantly higher for patients with a cachexia-associated diagnosis ($123,092; 95% CI = $119,664-$126,557) than for those without ($88,959; 95% CI = $86,964-$91,022). Patients with cachexia-associated diagnoses had significantly greater HRU than those without cachexia-associated diagnoses, including higher average 1-year hospital admissions (1.50; 95% CI = 1.47-1.53 vs 0.99; 95% CI = 0.97-1.01), emergency department visits (1.46; 95% CI = 1.42-1.50 vs 0.96; 95% CI = 0.93-0.98), outpatient visits (15.49; 95% CI = 15.15-15.83 vs 14.24; 95% CI = 14.02-14.46), and prescription fills (26.83; 95% CI = 26.31-27.35 vs 24.46; 95% CI = 24.11-24.80).
conclusionsPatients with colorectal, lung, and pancreatic cancer and cachexia-associated diagnoses had substantially higher 1-year HRU and cost of care compared with patients with cancer without cachexia-associated diagnoses. Our results highlight evidence of clinical and economic burden associated with cachexia-associated diagnoses in the US health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.