ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2026
Payers should cover COVID-19 vaccines for all ages and risk groups with no patient cost sharing.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 vaccine saved millions of lives during the pandemic. Clinical trials at the time of authorization and approval showed remarkable effectiveness. However, the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine has changed now that people are no longer naive to the virus. The benefit of vaccination is incrementally lower for some people, raising questions about who should receive the vaccine, what the vaccines should cost, and which subpopulations would be cost-effective to vaccinate. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) recently released its assessment of the COVID-19 vaccine. It was ICER's first vaccine assessment, presumably because of the uncertainty of future coverage policies for the COVID-19 vaccine. ICER found that the COVID-19 vaccine is most beneficial for the very young, the very old, and those in between with risk factors. Cost-effectiveness models mirror effectiveness assessments. Limiting vaccine access to people with risk factors in specific age bands would require a prior authorization, adding complexity and administrative costs for payers. Coverage restrictions may further reduce population vaccinations rates, resulting in higher virus community load and prolonged circulation. Although the US regulatory framework requires insurers to cover vaccines included on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Immunization Schedules without cost sharing, the future placement of COVID-19 vaccines on these schedules is uncertain. Given the evidence and population benefits, we support ICER's recommendation for private payers to cover COVID-19 vaccines with no patient cost sharing. We further recommend no restrictions on coverage based on risk factors, regardless of CDC Immunization Schedules, which have recently been subject to considerable uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.