Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42808492›Full record

ReviewThe plant genome2026

Balancing gain and diversity: Optimal contribution selection for sustainable genetic improvement in sugarcane.

Natalya Vo Van-Zivkovic, Ben J Hayes, Karen Aitken, Eric Dinglasan, Terry Morgan, Seema Yadav

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalya Vo Van-ZivkovicCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8838-2065
Ben J HayesCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-3970
Karen AitkenCentre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4372-0721
Eric DinglasanCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4824-5977
Terry MorganWilmar Sugar Australia Limited, Kalamia Mill, Ayr, Queensland, Australia.
Seema YadavCentre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7191-7770

Funding

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationUniversity of QueenslandWilmar Sugar Australia Limited
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids), the source of ∼80% of the worlds sugar, has experienced a plateau in genetic improvement over recent decades. This stagnation is largely due to the crop's complex polyploid genome and long breeding cycles, which limit the efficiency of traditional selection methods. Genomic selection (GS) has been proposed to accelerate breeding progress in sugarcane by enabling faster improvement of key commercial traits such as cane yield, sugar content, and disease resistance. However, especially in clonally propagated outbred crops like sugarcane, intensive GS can reduce genetic diversity. Prioritizing short-term genetic gain without managing diversity risks inbreeding depression, resulting in reduced vigor and decreased productivity and compromising long-term gains and potential for adaptability to changing environments. Optimal contribution selection (OCS) offers a strategic solution by optimizing parental contributions to maximize genetic gain while controlling the rate of inbreeding. This review outlines the challenges in sugarcane breeding, including high ploidy, complex genetic architecture, and low trait heritabilities. We propose the first conceptual framework for applying OCS in sugarcane, highlighting its potential to achieve sustainable genetic improvement. Furthermore, we explore extensions to the OCS framework that incorporate non-additive genetic effects (e.g., dominance and epistasis), allele dosages, and the multi-species germplasm that underpins modern cultivars. By balancing genetic gain with diversity retention, OCS provides a pathway for long-term progress in sugarcane breeding. In the context of rising global sugar demand and climate change, this balanced approach supports improved yield, quality, and resilience while maintaining the genetic diversity essential for future gains.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPlant BreedingSaccharumSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID42808492
PMCPMC13621457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.