Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42808485›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026

Immune boosting to combat Alzheimer's disease: Position statement.

Peter Aaby, Steven E Arnold, Christine Stabell Benn, Shay Ben-Haim, William Bishai, C Thomas Dow, Denise Faustman, Ofer N Gofrit, Charles L Greenblatt, Ruth Itzhaki and 11 more

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Peter AabyBandim Health Project, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Steven E ArnoldMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Christine Stabell BennUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Shay Ben-HaimHebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4737-9102
William BishaiJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
C Thomas DowMcPherson Eye Research Institute, Madison, WI, USA.
Denise FaustmanMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ofer N GofritHadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel.
Charles L GreenblattHebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7118-0238
Ruth ItzhakiUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Benjamin KleinHebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Richard LatheUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9698-9834
Mihai G NeteaRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alex SankinAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey F ScherrerSaint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Frederik Schaltz-BuchholzerUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7643-8322
Paul E SchulzMcGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Maxime TaquetUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Pierre N TariotUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Marc S WeinbergNeuroscience Clinical Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3184-7066
Vaccines for Dementia Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The societal cost of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias is immense, but there are no effective treatments. Emerging evidence suggests that AD brain pathology may be triggered by microbial infection, and that the diagnostic protein deposits in AD brain represent an antimicrobial defense mechanism. This raises the prospect of protection against AD through stimulation of the immune system. Specifically, non-specific activation through 'trained immunity' or 'immunopotentiation' is now known to offer protection against unrelated pathogens as well as against diverse diseases. Earlier findings that vaccine recipients are at reduced risk of developing AD have now been replicated around the world. Protection has been reported for diverse types of vaccines, and the effect sizes are clinically meaningful. Although these studies are predominantly observational, and are thus at risk of confounders such as 'healthy vaccinee' bias, several studies based on 'natural experiments' avoid this bias and provide stronger evidence that vaccine administration can reduce dementia risk. Most such vaccines can be obtained for a few dollars, although others are a little more expensive. But the cost of vaccination is entirely trivial compared to the financial burden of AD. Both clinical trials of immunopotentiation in AD and further research into the underlying mechanisms will be essential. This Position Statement briefly summarizes current knowledge and recommends that immune boosting should be placed at the top of the AD public health R&D agenda.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseBCGdementiaimmunopotentiationmicrobeposition statementtrained immunityvaccination

Identifiers

PMID42808485
PMCPMC13675531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.