Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42808355›Full record

ReviewBJS open2026

Familial adenomatous polyposis-associated desmoid disease: comprehensive review.

Benjamin Zare, Susan Clark, Palma Dileo, David Liska, Andrew Latchford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin ZareSt Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8866-3209
Susan ClarkSt Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Palma DileoSarcoma Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David LiskaDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8632-6065
Andrew LatchfordSt Mark's Centre for Familial Intestinal Cancer, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamilial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)-associated desmoid disease is a rare but important manifestation of FAP and remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In contrast to sporadic desmoids, which most commonly occur in the abdominal wall or extra-abdominal sites, approximately 70% of FAP-associated desmoids arise intra-abdominally, usually within the small bowel mesentery. These lesions can cause bowel and ureteric obstruction, sepsis, intestinal failure, and death. This review summarizes current evidence regarding the pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnosis, surveillance, and management of FAP-associated desmoid disease, and identifies key evidence gaps.

methodsA literature search was performed in accordance with PRISMA methodology using Medline, Embase, PROSPERO, Cochrane, Campbell, and Joanna Briggs Institute databases. Original research studies, reviews, and guidelines relating to desmoid disease, FAP-associated desmoid disease, and FAP published up to August 2025 were eligible. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively by topic.

resultsAberrant Wnt/β-catenin signalling resulting from a germline APC pathogenic variant and a somatic second hit underpin the development of FAP-associated desmoid disease. Established risk factors include a distal APC pathogenic variant, positive family history, and previous abdominal surgery. Diagnosis in patients with established FAP is usually clinicoradiological, and routine biopsy is generally unnecessary, except in select circumstances. Active surveillance is now recommended as first-line management for most patients because many lesions remain stable or regress spontaneously. Surgery is primarily reserved for complications, particularly in small bowel mesenteric disease, owing to substantial operative morbidity and a lack of demonstrated survival benefit from complete resection. Systemic therapy is indicated for progressive or symptomatic disease. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the γ-secretase inhibitor nirogacestat have demonstrated efficacy in randomized trials, although patients with FAP-associated disease comprise only a small proportion of enrolled patients. Evidence supporting the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anti-oestrogens remains limited.

conclusionImportant evidence gaps remain regarding optimal imaging strategies, predictors of aggressive disease, clinically meaningful trial endpoints, and FAP-specific treatment algorithms. Dedicated studies in genetically defined FAP cohorts are required to improve risk stratification and management.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiDesmoid TumorsHumansRisk Factorsactive surveillanceAPCdesmoid tumourdesmoid-type fibromatosisnirogacestattyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID42808355
PMCPMC13621219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.