ArticleGlobal health action2026
Gender-based violence response and health system readiness during emergencies in Sierra Leone: a qualitative study of survivor experience, facility preparedness, and referral pathways.
Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGender-based violence (GBV) intensifies during emergencies, yet health and protection systems in Sierra Leone remain inadequately prepared to respond. Survivors face barriers including stigma, breaches of confidentiality, and weak referral pathways.
objectiveThis study explored how health and protection systems in three districts of Sierra Leone respond to GBV during emergencies.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study was conducted across three districts, integrating semi-structured interviews with referral pathway mapping. Purposive sampling recruited 54 participants: 48 key informants across eight stakeholder groups and 6 survivors identified through referral organisations. Data were analysed using the framework method. Data collection took place outside an active emergency; emergency-specific findings therefore reflect participant recollection rather than direct observation.
resultsFour themes emerged: fragmented and under-resourced clinical readiness; confidentiality failures and stigma as structural barriers; dysfunctional referral pathways and coordination gaps; and limited, inconsistent survivor-centred psychosocial care. Participants reported that emergency contraception was frequently unavailable and, in some accounts, withheld on moral grounds. Referrals to police and social welfare were described as ad hoc, reliant on personal relationships, and severely disrupted when GBV was excluded from emergency coordination structures. Counsellors were largely absent from peripheral facilities. A minority of participants reported functioning one-stop centre care.
conclusionsParticipants described GBV response arrangements that were fragile in stable periods and, in their recollection of previous emergencies, substantially weakened, alongside a smaller set of components that functioned. Emergency preparedness planning would benefit from explicit attention to survivor-centred GBV care; the applicability of these district-level findings elsewhere requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.