ArticleStructural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.)2026
Putrescine-bound structure and multi-temperature crystallography provide new insights into ligand binding and conformational heterogeneity in spermidine synthase.
Article in Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spermidine synthase (SPDS) is an important enzyme in the pathway for the biosynthesis of polyamines, and it synthesizes the polyamine spermidine from putrescine (PUT) and decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine. This pathway is a promising target for antiproliferative therapies because of the functions of polyamines in cellular proliferation and differentiation. Higher polyamine levels are linked to cancer and cell proliferation. Previous structures of the enzyme were solved at cryogenic temperatures. Here, we report a new SPDS structure in complex with PUT (SPDS-PUT) and multitemperature crystallography of SPDS complexed with PUT and 5-deoxy-5-methylthioadenosine (MTA) at 100, 273, and 293 K to study its structure and dynamics. The results revealed that the occupancy of the active site is important for the extent of stabilization in the gatekeeping loop. The SPDS-PUT structure revealed putrescine binding in the absence of MTA, providing insight into its interactions within the active site and the conformational state of the gatekeeping loop. The binding of PUT alone was not enough to stabilize the gatekeeping loop, and greater stabilization of the loop occurred in the presence of MTA alone compared to PUT alone. The observed structural asymmetry between the gatekeeping loops of SPDS reflects differences in ligand binding between chains. These findings expand our understanding of the conformational landscape of SPDS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.