ArticleClinical hematology international2026
Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes toward the microbiome and fecal microbiotherapy or microbiota transfer in hematology and oncology: an international survey.
Article in Clinical hematology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gut microbiome has emerged as a critical factor influencing cancer progression, treatment response, and complications in hematology and oncology. Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is being explored as a novel biotherapeutic strategy, yet the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards its clinical use remain poorly defined. We conducted an international survey of 152 healthcare professionals, including hematologists, oncologists, transplant specialists, and others. Most respondents were affiliated with academic centers (66.0%) and practiced primarily in hematology (48.0%) or transplantation (34.0%). Awareness of the microbiome's clinical relevance was widespread, but perceptions of microbiome profiling and FMT remained cautious. One-third of participants were in favor of routine microbiome profiling, while half considered it promising but still investigational. Direct clinical experience with FMT was limited: only 20.4% had prescribed it and 14.5% had referred patients. Nonetheless, over half indicated they would consider adopting FMT in the near future. The main reported barriers to broader use included limited regulatory approval (63.8%), logistical or supply challenges (57.9%), and physician skepticism or lack of knowledge (51.3%). Despite these challenges, more than 70% of respondents expressed strong interest in further education, standardized guidelines, and training opportunities to support safe and effective implementation. This survey highlights a strong enthusiasm regarding microbiome-based interventions in cancer and transplantation care. While current clinical use remains limited, healthcare professionals recognize the therapeutic potential of FMT and call for structured education, multidisciplinary collaboration, and clear regulatory frameworks to enable its integration into routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.