ArticleRespiratory research & clinical practice2026
Sociodemographic profile of individuals eligible for lung cancer screening according to Brazilian guidelines: a national analysis.
Article in Respiratory research & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the sociodemographic profile of individuals eligible for lung cancer screening according to Brazilian guidelines. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging. We included individuals 50-80 years of age, with a smoking history of ≥ 20 pack-years, who were either current smokers or former smokers who had quit within the past 15 years. Demographic, socioeconomic, and health characteristics were analyzed. Results: Among 8,946 participants, 577 were eligible. Most (57.4%) were male and 37.4% were between 55 and 59 years of age. Black and Brown (mixed-race) participants accounted for 53.5% of the sample, and 60.6% had < 9 years of schooling. Self-rated health was poor/fair in 52.5% of the individuals, 89.3% had no private health insurance, and 41.9% were in the lowest tertile for household income. Our findings show that eligible individuals often present features associated with social vulnerability, such as a low level of education, low income, and limited access to health care. Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of considering sociodemographic factors in the implementation of lung cancer screening strategies, to ensure equity in access and effectiveness of public policies aimed at early diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.