Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42808042›Full record

ArticleClinical and public health guidelines2026

Planning a Clinical Practice Guideline Revision for a Core Set of Outcome Measures in Adults Undergoing Neurologic Physical Therapy, Part 1: Assessing Dissemination and Scholarly Uptake.

Jennifer L Moore, Jane E Sullivan, Marghuretta Bland, Wendy Romney, Elizabeth Anderl, Zeynep Gulen Erkoc, Kirsten Potter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and public health guidelines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer L MooreInstitute of Knowledge Translation, and Regional Rehabilitation Knowledge Center Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6968-0679
Jane E SullivanDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Evanston Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2352-9890
Marghuretta BlandWashington University School of Medicine Program in Physical Therapy St. Louis Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9091-2764
Wendy RomneyDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science Sacred Heart University Fairfield Connecticut USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4299-6021
Elizabeth AnderlTIRR Memorial Hermann Houston Texas USA.
Zeynep Gulen ErkocGroton School Groton Massachusetts USA.
Kirsten PotterSchool of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Doctor of Physical Therapy Tufts University Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5302-8507

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) facilitate evidence-based decision-making and standardising care, yet their dissemination and scholarly uptake vary widely. The Core Set of Outcome Measures for Adults With Neurologic Conditions Undergoing Rehabilitation CPG (Core Set) has been broadly referenced within neurologic physical therapy. As the next revision approaches, understanding its scholarly influence, citation patterns, and published feedback is essential. This study evaluated the dissemination and use of the Core Set across the peer-reviewed literature and identified areas for refinement. Methods: A medical librarian conducted comprehensive searches of Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus to identify peer-reviewed English-language articles citing the Core Set between July 1, 2018, and July 31, 2024. Reviewer pairs screened articles and extracted publication characteristics, citation context using an adapted Rabin et al. and Field et al. framework, and narrative feedback. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively. Constructive and positive feedback were thematically coded. Altmetric Attention Score, PlumX captures, and Mendeley readership data characterised broader dissemination and engagement. Results: Of 388 records, 176 articles met inclusion criteria. Most articles cited the Core Set once ( Discussion: Findings support maintaining the Core Set's methodological rigour while providing some suggestions for improvement.

Identifiers

PMID42808042
PMCPMC13618606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.