ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Safety and Effectiveness of a Gel Stent in Refractory Glaucoma in China: Real-World Evidence at 12 Months.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The XEN gel stent (XEN Glaucoma Treatment System®; AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA) is a minimally invasive bleb-forming device implanted ab-interno to lower intraocular pressure. The gel stent is approved to treat refractory glaucoma in China since 2020, based on interim real-world study data from patients at Hainan Boao Super Hospital. Final study data on the gel stent's effectiveness and safety in those patients are presented. Patients and Methods: The single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase 3b Hainan study collected data from Chinese patients with refractory glaucoma (ie, failed surgical treatment or primary open-angle/pseudoexfoliative/pigmentary glaucoma unresponsive to medical therapy) who underwent ab-interno gel stent implantation. This study was designed for both retrospective and prospective collection of real-world data. Primary Effectiveness Outcome: Proportion of study eyes at 12 months achieving ≥20% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction from baseline without increasing the number of IOP-lowering medications and without secondary surgical intervention. Secondary effectiveness outcomes: mean IOP and mean number of IOP-lowering medications used over time. Safety outcomes: intraoperative complications and postoperative treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), postoperative needling, and ophthalmic safety assessments. Results: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled that composed the effectiveness (n=59 eyes) and safety (n=62 eyes) populations. Among the 59 study eyes, 53 (89.8%) completed the 12-month visit. Mean IOP decreased from 23.7 mmHg on 3.3 IOP-lowering medications at baseline (47.5% of patients requiring ≥4 medications; 59.3% with prior glaucoma surgery) to 17.4 mmHg on 1.0 IOP-lowering medication at month 12. 49.0% (95% CI: 34.8-63.4) of the study eyes achieved the primary effectiveness outcome based on observed data. Among study eyes with baseline IOP ≥20 mmHg (n=31/59; 52.5%), IOP decreased from 30.4 mmHg on 3.4 medications (baseline) to 17.2 mmHg on 0.6 medications (month 12), and 17/28 (60.7%) achieved the primary outcome. No intraoperative complications or ocular TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were reported. Excluding expected inflammatory TEAEs following filtration surgery, IOP decreased (8.1%) and IOP increased (33.9%) were the most common TEAEs ≤7 and >7 days after surgery, respectively. Conclusions: The gel stent effectively lowered IOP and IOP-lowering medication burden in Chinese patients with refractory glaucoma, with no new unexpected safety findings, supporting its use as a minimally invasive bleb-forming surgical option in this population. Future considerations may include larger, prospective, comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.