ReviewJournal of pain research2026
Non-Surgical Management of Male Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A UPOINT-Guided Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary prostate pain syndrome (PPPS), formerly referred to as chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a prevalent and heterogeneous chronic pain condition characterized by persistent pelvic pain, lower urinary tract symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and substantial psychosocial burden. Objective: This narrative review summarizes current evidence on the pathophysiology, phenotype-based assessment, and non-surgical management of male CP/CPPS, with emphasis on UPOINT-guided multimodal care. Methods: Evidence was synthesized from guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized trials, observational studies, and relevant mechanistic literature addressing CP/CPPS, chronic pelvic pain, UPOINT phenotyping, pharmacological treatment, physical therapy, neuromodulation, and psychological interventions. Results: CP/CPPS is best understood as a multidimensional syndrome involving inflammation and immune dysregulation, peripheral and central sensitization, microbiome disturbance, autonomic imbalance, and psychosocial amplification. The UPOINT framework translates this heterogeneity into actionable domains and supports targeted combinations of urinary, organ-specific, infection-directed, neurologic/systemic, tenderness-focused, and psychosocial interventions. Conclusion: Non-surgical management of male CP/CPPS should move toward individualized, phenotype-guided multimodal therapy. In particular, pelvic floor physical therapy (for T phenotype) and neuromodulators/central analgesics (for N phenotype) should be prioritized over empiric monotherapy or prolonged antibiotic use. Future trials should use phenotype-stratified enrollment, standardized outcome measures, and longer follow-up to define optimal combinations and durability of benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.