ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Five-Year Follow-Up of Patients with Persistent Painful Temporomandibular Disorder After Multidisciplinary Assessment.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Painful temporomandibular disorders (pTMD) is a subgroup of TMD, which refers specifically to cases with persistent pain symptoms, often associated with significant functional and psychosocial impact. Purpose: To investigate the outcome of patients with persistent pTMD five years after multidisciplinary investigation. Patients and Methods: The present study was a five-year follow-up study of 74 patients with pTMD. Baseline data were available for 72 patients. At follow-up, 68 patients were invited to participate, but only 32 responded. A questionnaire equal to the baseline questionnaire, was sent to the patients. It investigated pain duration and pain intensity (General Pain Intensity questionnaire [GPI]), mandibular function (Mandibular Functional Index Questionnaire [MFIQ], two- question Coping Strategies Questionnaire [CSQ]), general health status, psychosocial factors, previous treatments. The follow up included the extent to which they have been followed up by their general medical practitioner (GMP) and whether their TMD symptoms have changed. Results: 32 out of 74 patients responded. Pain intensity and pain-related suffering had improved significantly, but mandibular function and restricted jaw movements remained unchanged. Follow-up by general medical practioners was rated poorly. Conclusion: Patients who responded to the five-year follow-up reported reduced pain intensity and pain-related suffering compared with baseline, while restricted jaw movements were found to be unchanged. Symptom duration alone showed no clear association with future pain severity and suffering in this sample. Changes in quality of life after multidisciplinary assessment seemed to vary across life domains. Given the low response rate at follow-up, the findings should be interpreted with caution and may not be representative of the entire original cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.