Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807900›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2026

'

Taine Te Miha, Harry J Dent, Yvette M Tinsley, Nichola Tyler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taine Te MihaSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Harry J DentCentre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Alphington, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9136-404X
Yvette M TinsleyFaculty of Law, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4283-8920
Nichola TylerSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3717-1941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study used interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) to examine six female New Zealand Crown prosecutors' (CPs') experiences of working with adult and child sexual violence and abuse (SVA) cases. Three themes were developed from the data: navigating the emotional and legal aspects of the role without a compass, the impacts of working with potentially traumatic material, and factors influencing wellbeing and help seeking. Working with SVA cases was viewed as rewarding by participants; however, exposure to sexual trauma was perceived to exacerbate occupational stressors and impacts of working with potentially traumatic material. A lack of training on interpersonal and emotional management skills and how to appropriately work with complainants of SVA were considered to exacerbate these stressors. Workplace culture, attitudes towards wellbeing and organisational support either alleviated or exacerbated occupational stressors and their impacts. Policy and practice to support female CPs working with SVA cases is urgently required.

Indexed as

attorneylawyerlegal professionalmoral distresspotentially traumatic materialsexual violencevicarious traumawellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42807900
PMCPMC13618147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.