ArticleCureus2026
Suspected Microplastic-Like Particles Recovered From Paired Human Small Intestine and Large Intestine Specimens: An Exploratory Post-mortem Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Evidence regarding suspected microplastic (MP)-like particles in human intestinal specimens remains limited. This study evaluated their occurrence and anatomical distribution in paired small and large intestinal specimens. Methodology This exploratory post-mortem study included 55 adults examined between March 2022 and December 2025. Intestinal specimens were processed using hydrogen peroxide digestion, glass-fiber filtration, Nile Red staining, fluorescence imaging, and ImageJ-based quantification. These screening methods did not provide polymer-specific identification. Histopathological changes were assessed, and clinical and laboratory data were extracted from medical records. Results Suspected MP-like particles were recovered from at least one intestinal specimen in 28 (50.9%) individuals. Detection was numerically more frequent in the large than in small intestinal specimens (38.2% vs. 21.8%), although the paired difference was not statistically significant. Urban residence was less frequent among individuals with screening-positive specimens (p = 0.026). No significant associations were identified for the other clinical and laboratory variables. In exploratory unadjusted analyses, screening positivity co-occurred more frequently with histological inflammation. However, small contingency tables, clinical heterogeneity, and potential confounding preclude causal interpretation. Necrosis was uncommon, and fibrosis was absent. Conclusions Suspected MP-like particles were recovered using a non-polymer-specific screening workflow. Their co-occurrence with non-specific inflammation is hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation using polymer-specific methods and rigorous contamination controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.