ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2026
Age-Related Differences in Clinical and Surgical Outcomes Following Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We compared patient outcomes following oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for degenerative lumbar spine conditions among different age groups. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients between January 2018 and July 2020. Patients were stratified into three groups based on age at the time of surgery (<65 years, 65 to <75 years, and ≥ 75 years). Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures were assessed, including visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D). Postoperative orthopedic events, including screw loosening, cage subsidence, and revision surgery, were recorded. All patients' survival status were followed until March 2023. Cox-proportional hazard models were conducted to examine the associations of age groups with postoperative orthopedic events and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 170 patients were analyzed (n=77, 68, and 25 for age <65 years, 65 to <75 years, and ≥ 75 years, respectively). VAS, ODI, and EQ-5D significantly improved after OLIF in all groups (all p<0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of postoperative screw loosening (p=0.702), cage subsidence (p=0.095), and revision surgery (p=0.265) across the three age groups. After a median follow up of 4.06 years, the three groups had no significant difference in orthopedic event-free survival (log-rank p=0.302). The findings were consistent after multivariate adjustment. Conclusion: OLIF is a safe and effective surgical option for elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spine conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.