ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Engineering strategies to address immune and delivery barriers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a barrier-matched translational framework.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, largely owing to profound therapeutic resistance driven by tumor heterogeneity, a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), dense desmoplastic stroma, immune exclusion, and impaired antitumor immune surveillance. Although conventional chemotherapy provides limited clinical benefit, immune-based therapies have shown modest efficacy in unselected PDAC, highlighting the need for strategies that overcome the biological barriers underlying immune resistance. Recent advances in precision medicine and bioengineering have generated a diverse range of therapeutic platforms aimed at remodeling the PDAC ecosystem. This review evaluates oncolytic virotherapy, gene-editing technologies, engineered immune-cell therapies, nanotechnology-enabled delivery systems, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted precision oncology according to the PDAC barriers they are intended to address and the maturity of the supporting evidence. Oncolytic viruses may enhance tumor immunogenicity and reshape suppressive immune niches, whereas gene editing and engineered cellular therapies provide opportunities to target oncogenic vulnerabilities, improve immune-cell function, and overcome antigenic and stromal constraints. Nanotechnology-based platforms can modify tissue access, payload exposure, and local immune modulation in selected models, whereas AI approaches support molecular and spatial stratification and generate treatment-prioritization hypotheses. Most supporting evidence remains preclinical or early phase, and no platform class has established broad comparative clinical benefit in unselected PDAC. Translation remains constrained by intratumoral heterogeneity, delivery limitations, safety, manufacturing complexity, and insufficient predictive biomarkers. Translation will depend on biomarker-defined enrollment and on linking administered dose to tumor exposure, target engagement, biological activity, safety, and the added benefit of the investigational component. We therefore present a barrier-matched development framework rather than a validated treatment-assignment algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.