ArticleERJ open research2026
Improving paediatric asthma outcomes in rural settings: clinical effectiveness of a multicomponent asthma care model.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Asthma is a leading cause of childhood hospitalisation and emergency department (ED) presentations in Australia. Barriers persist in accessing paediatric asthma care, particularly in rural areas. We implemented and evaluated a multicomponent model to reduce preventable hospital presentations across rural New South Wales. Methods: We conducted pre-post evaluation of children aged 5-12 years with asthma exacerbations across 13 hospitals in four rural NSW health districts. Children received: 1) a standardised discharge pack, 2) general practitioners (GP) and school linkage, 3) text reminders, and 4) nurse-led virtual home visits for uncontrolled asthma. Primary outcome was healthcare utilisation (ED presentations, admissions and GP visits) from electronic records, comparing matched pre-post periods at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included asthma control and quality of life at 6 and 12 months. Analyses used generalised estimating equations and mixed-effects models to calculate adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) and mean differences. Results: 188 children participated (62% male, mean age 7.6 years). ED presentations decreased 93% at 1 month (aRR 0.07, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.12), 85% at 3 months (aRR 0.15, 0.10-0.22), 78% at 6 months (aRR 0.22, 0.16-0.30) and 69% at 12 months (aRR 0.31, 0.25-0.40). Hospital admissions decreased 97%, 95%, 90% and 81%. Uncontrolled asthma decreased from 73% to 37% (6 months) and 30% (12 months). Asthma control and quality of life improved significantly at both timepoints. Conclusion: This multisite study achieved sustained reductions in preventable hospitalisations and meaningful improvements in asthma control and quality of life. This model offers a replicable approach for underserved populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.