Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807808›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

Phylogeny-guided curation reveals widespread misannotation of Asgard archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences in public databases.

Agathe Struillou, Philippe Deschamps, David Moreira, Purificación López-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agathe StruillouEcologie Société Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Philippe DeschampsEcologie Société Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6497-913X
David MoreiraEcologie Société Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2064-5354
Purificación López-GarcíaEcologie Société Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-0651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate taxonomic assignment of 16S rRNA gene sequences is essential for the reliable interpretation of microbial community studies based on amplicon sequence data. Yet, it critically depends on the reliability of reference databases such as the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) and the SILVA ribosomal RNA database. Here, we evaluate the consistency of taxonomic annotations within the Asgardarchaeota phylum, a lineage of major evolutionary and ecological interest. Using a phylogenetically curated set of GTDB-derived 16S rRNA gene sequences, we show that most of the affiliations of these sequences were consistent with the phylogenomic placement of their corresponding metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), although a small fraction of them exhibited clear inconsistencies likely resulting from erroneous binning to MAGs. In contrast, phylogenetic analyses of SILVA-derived 16S rRNA gene sequences including curated reference sequences revealed widespread taxonomic misannotation and/or limited resolution of taxon assignment. Specifically, many sequences annotated as Odinarchaeales robustly clustered within Lokiarchaeia, Heimdallarchaeia, Hermodarchaeia, or Sifarchaeia, leading to an artificial inflation of Odinarchaeales assignments and potentially biased ecological interpretations. To mitigate these issues, we constructed a curated reference dataset of Asgardarchaeota 16S rRNA gene sequences and generated phylogenetically validated taxonomic assignments across clustered entries, providing a resource for improved classification of environmental sequences. Our results demonstrate that widely used reference databases can contain systematic annotation errors that propagate across studies and distort ecological inference. Although illustrated using Asgard archaea, these limitations are likely pervasive across understudied microbial diversity, highlighting the need for routine phylogenetic validation and systematic curation of reference datasets.

Indexed as

16S rRNAAsgardarchaeotametagenome-assembled genomesmolecular phylogenysequence databasestaxonomic annotation

Identifiers

PMID42807808
PMCPMC13617573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.