ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026
RAGE signaling in acute myocardial infarction: sRAGE as a dynamic biomarker and emerging therapeutic target.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a multiligand pattern-recognition receptor involved in inflammation, oxidative stress, and cardiometabolic disease. In acute myocardial infarction (AMI), activation of the AGE-RAGE signaling axis contributes to ischemia-reperfusion injury and post-infarction cardiac remodeling. Its soluble isoform (sRAGE) has emerged as a potential circulating biomarker related to RAGE pathway activity. Experimental studies support a role for RAGE in amplifying myocardial injury through inflammatory and oxidative mechanisms. In clinical settings, circulating sRAGE levels have been associated with markers of myocardial damage and disease severity; however, findings remain inconsistent, with both direct and inverse associations reported. Interpretation is further complicated by differences in sRAGE isoforms, heterogeneity in study design, timing of measurement, and lack of standardized analytical methods. Consequently, no validated cut-off values or clinical applications have been established. Limited longitudinal evidence suggests that the clinical significance of sRAGE may vary over the course of AMI. Higher acute-phase levels have been associated with myocardial injury and adverse outcomes in some cohorts, whereas longitudinal changes may reflect distinct biological processes and carry different prognostic information. These observations support further investigation of sRAGE kinetics as a potential complement to single time-point measurements, although prospective longitudinal validation is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.