Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807804›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Category-ComBat with distribution coefficient: a scale-adaptive harmonization algorithm for multicenter radiomic feature standardization.

Xiaolei Zhang, Xiaona Wang, Wei Wang, Lijun Lu, Mohammad Hamiruce Marhaban, Xianling Dong, Yanli Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaolei Zhang *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, China.
Xiaona Wang *Department of Radiology, Dalian Women and Children's Medical Group, Dalian, China.
Wei WangThe Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, China.
Lijun LuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Mohammad Hamiruce MarhabanFaculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Xianling DongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, China.
Yanli LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Multicenter radiomic studies are fundamentally constrained by inter-center feature variability arising from differences in scanner hardware, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction parameters. Existing harmonization methods, including ComBat, treat these sources of variability as undifferentiated batch noise and primarily correct feature distribution location, leaving scale-level heterogeneity unaddressed. This study proposes Category-ComBat with Distribution Coefficient (Category-ComBat-ω), a two-level harmonization framework for multicenter CT radiomics. Methods: A total of 1,789 pulmonary nodule CT images were retrospectively collected from three public datasets (LIDC-IDRI, NSCLC-Radiomics, and Lung-PET-CT-Dx), with 93 radiomic features extracted per case. Category-ComBat reconstructs the ComBat framework by explicitly separating imaging-related variability into systematic components, including scanner type, acquisition protocol, and reconstruction kernel, and random components. Individualized least-squares estimation was used to estimate systematic biases, together with category-stratified mean normalization. A distribution coefficient ω ∈ (0, 1] was introduced as an orthogonal scale-adjustment mechanism to adaptively compress feature distribution spread without perturbing category-level means. Performance was evaluated using Wilcoxon tests, Q-Q plots, three-dimensional principal component analysis (PCA), probability density plots, coefficient of variation (COV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and downstream machine learning classification experiments. Results: Category-ComBat effectively removed systematic inter-center variability while preserving benign-malignant discriminative separation. Introduction of ω progressively improved feature reproducibility and inter-center consistency as ω decreased. The best overall performance, evaluated using ICC, COV, and classification AUC, was observed for ω values between 0.5 and 0.9. Scale compression remained independent of location adjustment, confirming the orthogonality of the two-level design. Category-ComBat achieved the highest classification performance, with the mean AUC increasing from 0.84 for the Original features and 0.82 for ComBat to 0.89 after Category-ComBat harmonization. Discussion: Category-ComBat-ω provides a principled approach to multicenter radiomic harmonization by addressing both systematic imaging-related confounding and scale heterogeneity. Its tunable distribution coefficient enables flexible adjustment of feature distribution spread while preserving category-level means, providing an adaptable framework for different multicenter radiomic study requirements.

Indexed as

algorithmcategory-ComBatdiscriminativemulticenter harmonizationradiomics

Identifiers

PMID42807804
PMCPMC13617529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.