ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Category-ComBat with distribution coefficient: a scale-adaptive harmonization algorithm for multicenter radiomic feature standardization.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Multicenter radiomic studies are fundamentally constrained by inter-center feature variability arising from differences in scanner hardware, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction parameters. Existing harmonization methods, including ComBat, treat these sources of variability as undifferentiated batch noise and primarily correct feature distribution location, leaving scale-level heterogeneity unaddressed. This study proposes Category-ComBat with Distribution Coefficient (Category-ComBat-ω), a two-level harmonization framework for multicenter CT radiomics. Methods: A total of 1,789 pulmonary nodule CT images were retrospectively collected from three public datasets (LIDC-IDRI, NSCLC-Radiomics, and Lung-PET-CT-Dx), with 93 radiomic features extracted per case. Category-ComBat reconstructs the ComBat framework by explicitly separating imaging-related variability into systematic components, including scanner type, acquisition protocol, and reconstruction kernel, and random components. Individualized least-squares estimation was used to estimate systematic biases, together with category-stratified mean normalization. A distribution coefficient ω ∈ (0, 1] was introduced as an orthogonal scale-adjustment mechanism to adaptively compress feature distribution spread without perturbing category-level means. Performance was evaluated using Wilcoxon tests, Q-Q plots, three-dimensional principal component analysis (PCA), probability density plots, coefficient of variation (COV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and downstream machine learning classification experiments. Results: Category-ComBat effectively removed systematic inter-center variability while preserving benign-malignant discriminative separation. Introduction of ω progressively improved feature reproducibility and inter-center consistency as ω decreased. The best overall performance, evaluated using ICC, COV, and classification AUC, was observed for ω values between 0.5 and 0.9. Scale compression remained independent of location adjustment, confirming the orthogonality of the two-level design. Category-ComBat achieved the highest classification performance, with the mean AUC increasing from 0.84 for the Original features and 0.82 for ComBat to 0.89 after Category-ComBat harmonization. Discussion: Category-ComBat-ω provides a principled approach to multicenter radiomic harmonization by addressing both systematic imaging-related confounding and scale heterogeneity. Its tunable distribution coefficient enables flexible adjustment of feature distribution spread while preserving category-level means, providing an adaptable framework for different multicenter radiomic study requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.