ArticleJournal of skin cancer2026
Real-World Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma, Including Acral and Mucosal Subtypes: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a Latin American Center.
Article in Journal of skin cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Real-world evidence on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in Latin American patients with melanoma remains limited, particularly for acral and mucosal subtypes. We evaluated survival, radiologic response, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and exploratory factors associated with outcomes in a Colombian cohort. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort included consecutive patients with histologically confirmed melanoma who received ≥ 1 ICI dose between February 2017 and November 2022. Patients were classified as adjuvant- or palliative-intent. rwOS and irAEs were assessed in the overall cohort; rwDFS in the adjuvant-intent cohort; and rwPFS and best radiologic response in the palliative-intent cohort. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, with median follow-up calculated by reverse Kaplan-Meier. Primary Cox proportional hazards analyses of rwPFS and rwOS were restricted to the palliative-intent cohort. Results: Fifty-seven patients were included: 20 received adjuvant- and 37 palliative-intent therapy. Median age was 65 years (IQR, 54-76); acral and mucosal melanoma accounted for 26 (45.6%) and 11 (19.3%) cases, respectively. Median follow-up was 32.3 months (95% CI, 25.9-42.3). In the adjuvant-intent cohort, median rwDFS and rwOS were 23.3 months (95% CI, 4.8-not reached) and 33.0 months (95% CI, 30.1-not reached), respectively. In the palliative-intent cohort, median rwPFS and rwOS were 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.0-24.1) and 26.0 months (95% CI, 17.9-not reached), respectively. Among 31 response-evaluable patients, ORR was 38.7% (95% CI, 23.7-56.2) and DCR was 54.8% (95% CI, 37.8-70.8). IrAEs were documented in 31 patients (54.4%); five had Grade 3 events, and no Grade 4 or five irAEs were documented. In adjusted models, ECOG performance status and melanoma subtype were not significantly associated with rwPFS or rwOS. Conclusions: ICIs demonstrated antitumor activity in this Colombian real-world cohort, including patients with acral and mucosal melanoma, although survival estimates were numerically lower than those reported in selected pivotal trials. Documented toxicity was predominantly low grade. Exploratory analyses suggested more favorable outcomes in patients with conventional cutaneous melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.