ArticleDigital health
Media literacies, platform imaginaries and mental health influencers: How young people respond to mental health content on TikTok.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Social media is increasingly used as a source of mental health information for young people, with influencers playing a key role in public health communication. However, little is known about how young people engage with influencer mental health content and the media literacy skills they use to evaluate it. The objective of this study is to explore and evaluate the self-reported media literacy skills and beliefs that young people use when they encounter mental health content on TikTok. Methods: The study uses qualitative, thematic analysis to provide an empirical account of how young people interpret mental health content from influencers on TikTok. Research was conducted via eighteen group (n = 73 participants) and individual interviews (n = 13) with eighty-six participants in the United Kingdom. The analysis focused on self-reported media literacy skills and strategies for navigating influencer-led mental health content. Results: The study identifies three contextual challenges in young people's responses to mental health content on TikTok: (I) reliability and relatability act as distinct but complementary criteria used to assess influencers and their mental health content; (II) platform beliefs influence willingness to engage with mental health content; and (III) algorithmically driven platform design hinders critical thinking about mental health content. Conclusions: These findings highlight the sophistication of young people's media literacy skills alongside the significant, contextual barriers, which hinder the use of social media as a channel for mental health support from influencers. Our results suggest that public health campaigns may need to take a more platform-sensitive approach to online communication, acknowledging the ways platform-driven beliefs and design shape how and why young people engage with mental health content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.