ReviewJournal of Cancer2026
Urine-derived induced pluripotent stem cells for non-invasive diagnosis of bladder cancer.
Review in Journal of Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BLCA) remains one of the most prevalent and costly malignancies worldwide, largely owing to its high recurrence rate and the invasive nature of conventional surveillance modalities. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology offers a new framework for disease modeling and, potentially, precision diagnostics. Urine provides a non-invasive, renewable source of exfoliated urothelial and renal epithelial cells amenable to direct reprogramming. Here, we review the biological rationale, reprogramming methodology, and diagnostic potential of urine-derived iPSCs (UDiPSCs) in the context of BLCA detection and monitoring. We further discuss the genomic fidelity of UDiPSCs, the extent to which they may retain patient-relevant oncogenic features, their integration with multi-omics platforms, and the translational challenges that must be resolved before clinical deployment. Because reprogramming resets the somatic epigenome and transcriptome, we propose a tiered strategy in which methylation is assessed in parental urinary cells, genomic variants in reprogrammed clones, and transcriptional phenotypes in differentiated derivatives. Compared with urinary tumor DNA methylation panels and urine-derived tumor organoids, which currently exceed cell-based reprogramming approaches in accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and turnaround, UDiPSCs offer a distinct niche: interrogating rare, non-tumorigenic, field-altered urothelial cells that are diluted in bulk urinary DNA and do not form organoids. Collectively, UDiPSC-based platforms provide a plausible route toward non-invasive, personalized BLCA biomarkers, although clinical utility remains to be established through prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.