Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807725›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2026

EfficientNetB5-Based Deep Learning for Automated Cancer Detection in Tissue Microarray Images.

Kuo-Wang Tsai, Bach-Tung Pham, Ching-Feng Cheng, Chun-Fan Lung, Wenny Ramadha Putri, Farchan Raswa, Jia-Ching Wang, Yi-Chiung Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kuo-Wang TsaiDepartment of Research, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Bach-Tung PhamDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ching-Feng ChengDepartment of Pediatrics, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chun-Fan LungDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wenny Ramadha PutriDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan.
Farchan RaswaDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan.
Jia-Ching WangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan.
Yi-Chiung HsuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tissue microarray (TMA) technology is pivotal in cancer research, enabling simultaneous analysis of multiple samples on a single slide. Manual analysis of TMA images remains time-consuming and subjective. This study aimed to develop a robust deep learning model to automate TMA image analysis, enhance accuracy, and support cancer diagnosis. Methods: We utilized the EfficientNetB5 deep learning architecture to classify TMA images from the DigitalSlide01 v1_1M01 dataset, comprising breast cancer, Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC), and gastric cancer samples. Data augmentation methods, including Mix-Up and Cut-Mix, were employed to improve generalization. Preprocessing involved Otsu thresholding and smart bounding box cropping. The model was trained over 80 epochs using the Adam optimizer, a learning rate scheduler, and categorical cross-entropy loss. Performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and a separate test set, with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score as the primary metrics. Performance was further examined using physical-array-held-out and sample-level analyses. Results: Across the 10 cross-validation validation folds, mean accuracy and F1-score were 85.93% and 82.78%, respectively. Across the separate test-set evaluations by the ten fold-specific models, mean accuracy and F1-score were 80.08% and 75.13%, respectively. In the sample-level analysis, a 10-model mean-probability ensemble achieved 87.80% accuracy and 78.18% macro F1-score on the 246-core test subset. Cancer precision was 100.00% in the reported ensemble analysis, indicating that no Normal or Others samples were observed among samples predicted as Cancer; this does not imply that all Cancer samples were detected. Conclusions: The EfficientNetB5-based framework showed useful aggregate classification performance. These findings support the feasibility of automated TMA image classification and emphasize the need for source-balanced external multicenter validation before broader clinical application.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancer detectiondeep learningefficientnetb5histopathology image analysistissue microarray

Identifiers

PMID42807725
PMCPMC13617411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.