ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Evaluation of a hybrid battery digital twin for joint SOC-SOE estimation under real driving conditions.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable estimation of battery state of charge (SOC) and state of energy (SOE) under real world dynamic driving conditions is essential for battery management systems. However, traditional physics-based models and purely data-driven models struggle to adapt and generalize. This work proposes Closed-Loop Hybrid Digital Twin (CL-HDT) that synergizes adaptive physics twin, recurrent residual learning, physics guided optimization, and recursive state feedback for joint SOC-SOE estimation. Adaptive physics twin generates physically consistent reference estimate and residual from closed-loop recurrent model recursively corrects it. The proposed CL-HDT was developed with a dataset containing 30 real-world electric cycle driving trips, split with leakage-safe strategy into training, validation, and locked holdout test set. To analyze generalizability, leave-one-trip-out cross-validation (LOTO-CV) was applied within training set. The proposed architecture was benchmarked against five baselines including Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Feature-Fusion Recurrent estimator (FFR), Residual-Guided Hybrid estimator (RGH), and Adaptive Physics Twin (APT). All the baselines and CL-HDT were trained and evaluated under identical pipeline to ensure fair comparison. CL-HDT attained strongest generalization in LOTO-CV with mean RMSE values of 0.7078% and 0.6883% for SOC and SOE respectively, while maintaining competitive performance in locked holdout test. Apart from aggregate metrics, CL-HDT was further evaluated using residual correction analysis, tracking curves, drift curves, component-wise ablation, error distribution, and ambient condition analysis to demonstrate its robustness and ability to mitigate accumulation of error over longer real-world trips. This approach offers a physically consistent solution for next-generation battery management systems under realistic driving conditions to support safety and battery life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.