ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026
Sex-specific shape models to disentangle sex effects and age-associated anatomical variation in biventricular cardiac anatomy.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Age- and sex-related differences in cardiac anatomy are well established using conventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance biomarkers, but their representation in 3D ventricular shape remains unclear. In pooled statistical shape models, leading modes may be dominated by between-sex anatomical variation, potentially obscuring within-sex age-associated variation. This study evaluated whether sex-specific statistical shape models provide a more interpretable representation of age-associated ventricular variation than a sex-agnostic model. Methods: Biventricular meshes were reconstructed from cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images in a cross-sectional screened asymptomatic Swiss adult cohort aged 18-85 years. End-diastolic anatomies from 185 male and 187 female participants were used to construct statistical shape models for the pooled cohort and separately by sex. Shape modes were interpreted using anatomical visualization, variance decomposition, associations with conventional demographic, anthropometric, and CMR biomarkers. Results: The first pooled model mode explained 31% of total shape variance, compared with 22% and 19% for the first male- and female-specific modes. In the pooled model, 57% of first-mode variance was attributable to between-sex differences. Age-associated variation in the pooled model was distributed across the first two modes, whereas sex-specific models organized age-associated variation within each sex. In males, the strongest adjusted age association occurred in the second sex-specific mode, which correlated with ventricular volume and mass. In females, age-associated variation was concentrated in the first mode and was inversely associated with ventricular volumes and myocardial mass. Conclusion: These findings support sex-specific anatomical reference models for capturing within-sex cardiac ageing structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.