Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807677›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2026

Automated GenePy gene-burden computation via a reproducible Nextflow workflow integrated with the Genomics England (GEL) Lifebit platform.

Iman Nazari, Guo Cheng, James Ashton, Sarah Ennis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iman NazariDepartment of Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2584-0909
Guo ChengDepartment of Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
James AshtonDepartment of Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0348-8198
Sarah EnnisDepartment of Human Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2648-0869

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpretation of rare-disease genomes remains constrained by variant-centric analytical frameworks that insufficiently capture the cumulative impact of multiple variants within a gene. GenePy provides an individual-level, gene-based burden metric that integrates variant consequence, allele frequency, and zygosity into a unified quantitative score, enabling a transition from discrete variant annotation to aggregated gene-level interpretation. In the context of Genomics England (GEL), this formulation supports a panel-agnostic, genotype-to-phenotype diagnostic strategy for unresolved monogenic disorders by prioritizing genes with elevated mutational burden per individual. Here, we present a fully automated, containerized GenePy workflow deployed through Nextflow and integrated within the GEL Research Environment via the Lifebit CloudOS platform. This implementation provides scalable, secure, and governance-compliant computation of gene-level burden scores across population-scale cohorts. The workflow harmonizes variant annotation, quality control, and chunked data aggregation within modular, reproducible processes designed for high-throughput execution on cloud-native infrastructure. By enabling robust, portable, and auditable gene-level scoring across large rare-disease sequencing datasets, this framework enhances analytical resolution and supports downstream statistical prioritization, integrative phenotype matching, and hypothesis generation within genotype-to-phenotype diagnostic workflows.

Indexed as

GenomicsSoftwareHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID42807677
PMCPMC13617351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.