ArticleGMS journal for medical education2026
Understanding of medical leadership from the perspective of medical students at the start of their studies and in their final year - a qualitative focus group study.
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Physicians have to take on a wide range of leadership responsibilities, management as well as leadership tasks. A purely management-orientated approach is no longer sufficient to be successful as a physician leader in the dynamic healthcare sector. This explorative, qualitative study therefore analyzed the understanding of medical leadership among students in their first-semester and in their final year. Methods: Seven group discussions were conducted with 14 first-semester and 17 final-year students, participating in homogenous cohorts. These group discussions were transcribed verbatim, analyzed using Kuckartz' content-structuring qualitative content analysis, and compared with international frameworks. Results: A total of 514 text segments were coded which could be assigned to 12 main categories comprising 49 subcategories. The main category "Demonstrating emotional-social competence" was the most frequently mentioned in both cohorts. Differences emerged between the cohorts regarding the perspectives on personnel development though. While first-semester students emphasized the development of the leaders themselves, final-year students discussed the development of the employees more frequently. Not all aspects of the international frameworks became visible in the students' understanding. Conclusion: Medical students showed a relatively comprehensive understanding of medical leadership, but not all aspects of recognized frameworks were included in their understanding. Since a cohort-specific perspective on some aspects of medical leadership emerged, this varying need for development could be addressed by a longitudinal curriculum on medical leadership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.