ArticleAphasiology2026
Aphasia among Medicare fee for service beneficiaries: initial encounter for services and discharge disposition.
Article in Aphasiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Studies report that 25-50% of stroke survivors in the United States Methods: Data included 100% of FFS Medicare claims for Home Health Agency (HHA), Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF), Inpatient, Outpatient, and Carrier files. The sample included Medicare beneficiaries who incurred an inpatient claim between January 1, 2016 and October 1, 2019 with stroke as the primary diagnosis. Results: We identified 745,917 unique FFS Medicare beneficiaries with a primary stroke diagnosis; 90% were over age 65. Approximately 79% were non-Hispanic White, 12% were non-Hispanic Black, and 6% were Hispanic. Among all patients with a stroke hospitalization, 14.5% were diagnosed with aphasia within 90 days, with racial/ethnic variations. Between 50% and 55% of people with aphasia (PWA) had their initial encounter in an inpatient hospital facility, 15%-20% in a skilled nursing facility, and 8%-12% in a rehabilitation facility. Roughly 10-15% of PWA were discharged home, 30% to a skilled nursing facility, 40% to a long-term care/rehabilitation center, and 10% to home health. A smaller percentage of non-Hispanic Black PWA (9.9%) were discharged home compared to non-Hispanic White PWA (13.6%). Similarly, a slightly larger portion of non-Hispanic Black PWA were discharged to a long-term care/rehabilitation facility (41.4%) than their non-Hispanic White PWA counterparts (40%). Conclusions: The rate of aphasia remained relatively unchanged across the four-year period evaluated. Initial encounters for their aphasia varied across settings and the locations to which they were discharged after their acute care stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.