Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807635›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2026

Final-year logbooks in otorhinolaryngology in Germany - insights from a needs analysis and user experience study of final-year students and supervisors.

Kathrin Gerstacker, Jonas Engert, Luke Lükewille, Adrian von Witzleben, Lisa Budelmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathrin GerstackerUniversity Medical Center Freiburg, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Freiburg, Germany.
Jonas EngertUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Würzburg, Germany.
Luke LükewilleUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kiel, Germany.
Adrian von WitzlebenUlm University Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm, Germany.
Lisa BudelmannUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In an effort to improve the structured training during the practical year in Germany, the German Medical Licensing Regulations have made it mandatory for final-year students to keep a logbook in 2013. This strategy aims to ensure the relevance and review of learning content and to improve the transparency and quality of teaching in the final year. The logbook recommended by the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology is to be used nationwide. Methods: Our study investigated the acceptance and use of logbooks through voluntary, anonymous online surveys of supervisors and students in Germany. The questionnaires contained eight and twelve questions, respectively. A total of 50 supervisors and 28 students participated in the survey. Results: The results showed that 26% of supervisors and 21% of students do not use a logbook. 64% of the supervisors preferred a digital version of the logbook, while 60.7% of the students also mostly agree with a digital version. It is particularly noteworthy that 79% of the students, who currently rarely use the logbook (as an analog version), stated that they would use it more often if it were available digitally. Conclusion: Our study confirms the highly heterogeneous use of logbooks during the practical year in otorhinolaryngology. Faculty-owned logbooks can be customized to specific curricula and needs more easily, which explains their popularity. Although most supervisors consider digitization useful, there are concerns about the effort involved and the potential lack of added value. Therefore, a digitized logbook should be designed not only as a control tool, but also as an interactive learning companion with clear learning objectives, in order to promote internal learning motivation.

Indexed as

OtolaryngologyStudents, MedicalCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleGermanyHumansNeeds AssessmentSurveys and Questionnairesdigitalizationfinal-year medical educationinteractivelogbookotorhinolaryngology

Identifiers

PMID42807635
PMCPMC13617268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.