ArticleGMS journal for medical education2026
From competency mapping to curriculum development: Identifying gaps in an undergraduate general practice clerkship - a mixed-methods study.
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to show the process of developing a competency-based medical education (CBME) General Practice (GP) block clerkship at the University of Heidelberg, aligned with frameworks such as CanMEDS, Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), and the National Competency-based Learning Objectives Catalogue (NKLM 2.0). Objectives are to identify competencies addressed in the current two-week clerkship, determine additional content needed to cover all required competencies, and assess student perspectives. Methods: A questionnaire completed by 165 students in 2023 evaluated perceived competence in various areas and their interest in GP before and after the clerkship. Data were analysed using a 5-point Likert scale ((1=fully agree to 5=completely disagree), and the curriculum was mapped to NKLM 2.0, CanMEDS, and EPAs to identify represented and missing competencies. Focus group meetings with lecturers and students were held to develop a new concept. Results: The current clerkship received an overall rating of 1.8 (SD: 1.06) but did not significantly increase interest in GP careers. Some competencies were well-covered, but areas like interprofessional skills or leadership and management were lacking. A six-week longitudinal clerkship was proposed to address these gaps, focusing on interprofessional collaboration, leadership, and patient-centred care, and including digital teaching, reflection and simulation training, and shadowing experiences. Conclusion: The proposed CBME curriculum addresses evolving needs in medical education. Successful implementation will require longitudinal integration, interdisciplinary cooperation, trained preceptors, and centralised coordination. This study provides a roadmap for emphasising key competencies, promoting GP career choice, and contributing to high-quality patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.