ArticleNeurophotonics2026
Physics-informed neural network for mapping vascular and tissue dynamics using laser speckle contrast imaging.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Quantitatively mapping both cerebral blood flow and tissue dynamics from laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is powerful for studying cerebral blood flow and neurovascular coupling, particularly in the context of stroke. Conventional multi-exposure fitting is slow and difficult to scale. Efficient, physically grounded methods are needed to extract both vascular and tissue dynamic biomarkers from LSCI data. Aim: We aim to develop and validate a physics-informed neural network (PINN) that quantitatively estimates fast (vascular) and slow (tissue-related) speckle decorrelation parameters directly from LSCI measurements without requiring ground-truth labels. Approach: We developed a PINN to estimate fast (vascular) and slow (tissue-related) speckle decorrelation parameters directly from multi-exposure LSCI data without requiring ground-truth labels. The analytical LSCI model is embedded in the network loss function, enforcing consistency with speckle physics during training. The model operates in a self-supervised manner and performs pixel-wise inference across full-field images. The framework was evaluated using Results: The PINN accurately recovered fast decorrelation rates associated with cerebral blood flow and slower dynamics linked to tissue and cellular motion. The parameter maps closely match those from traditional nonlinear fitting, but at orders-of-magnitude higher speed, reducing analysis to under 1 s per image. It also generalizes to unseen subjects and remains robust under noise. Conclusions: Our approach establishes physics-informed learning as a practical framework for near-real-time extraction of vascular and cellular biomarkers from LSCI, enabling longitudinal monitoring of stroke progression and potentially facilitating clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.