ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Male sexual dysfunction associated with TNF-α inhibitors: an indication-stratified global pharmacovigilance analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors are widely used for chronic inflammatory diseases, but their effects on male sexual health remain uncertain. We investigated whether male sexual dysfunction (MSD) reporting varied across TNF-α inhibitors and clinical indications. Methods: We screened MSD reports associated with TNF-α inhibitors in WHO VigiAccess and performed a disproportionality analysis of individual case safety reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004 to 2025. Four disproportionality algorithms were used to evaluate overall, indication-specific, and preferred term (PT)-specific reporting patterns. Time-to-onset was assessed using Weibull modeling. Results: No overall positive MSD signal was detected for any TNF-α inhibitor. In ankylosing spondylitis (AS), indication-level reporting odds ratio (ROR) signals were observed for adalimumab (ROR 1.80, 95% CI 1.11-2.92) and etanercept (ROR 2.21, 95% CI 1.37-3.55), but their direct comparison was not significant (ROR ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.41-1.61). No positive PT-specific ROR signal was detected for either drug in AS. Among reports with usable onset dates, Weibull analysis suggested earlier reporting patterns. Conclusion: MSD reporting with TNF-α inhibitors may vary by clinical indication rather than represent a uniform class-wide pattern. The AS findings warrant cautious interpretation because both agents showed indication-level signals without a significant between-drug difference or positive PT-specific signals. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.