ArticlePeerJ2026
Take-off and landing techniques in snowboard halfpipe based on inertial measurement units and kinematics analysis.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The unique characteristics of snowboard halfpipe projects present a research challenge. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) show promise in addressing the prevailing research problems due to their numerous advantages. This study aims to explore the key technical characteristics of the take-off and landing phases in snowboard halfpipe to analyse the key factors that affect the take-off quality and landing stability of athletes at different sport levels. Methods: The study used an IMU-based motion capture system combined with high-speed video recording ( Results: The elite athletes reached the vertical position at approximately 50% of the normalized take-off phase, compared with approximately 60% in novice athletes. The overall speeds achieved by the elite athletes were greater than those of the novice athletes. The elite group demonstrated a lower flexion range of motion and a stiffer landing pattern than the novice group. Conclusion: These findings suggest that snowboard halfpipe performance may depend on the coordinated control of take-off timing, snowboard inclination, and landing posture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.