ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Role of the left intraparietal sulcus in the comprehension of action intensity described in sentences.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From an embodied cognition perspective, semantic processing is assumed to involve sensorimotor representations. The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate whether comprehension of action intensity described in sentences is associated with neural representations shared with action execution, particularly those related to grip force. In the execution task, participants gripped their right hand with either high or low force. In the language task, participants evaluated the action intensity described in the sentences. We examined four regions of interest (ROIs): the left primary somatosensory cortex, left primary motor cortex, left dorsal premotor cortex, and the left intraparietal sulcus (LIPS). Multivoxel pattern analysis was used to assess whether intensity information could be decoded within and across tasks. In the execution task, intensity differences were reliably decoded from multivoxel activity patterns across all four regions. In the language task, significant decoding of intensity was observed only in the LIPS. Cross-classification between the execution and language tasks did not reach significance in the primary analysis across the four regions and was associated with low effect sizes. However, exploratory analyses using smaller ROIs revealed significant cross-decoding and moderate effect sizes in the LIPS. These findings suggest that the comprehension of action intensity is associated with higher-level intensity-related representations rather than with neural representations that are closely tied to low-level motor execution. Overall, the results do not support strong embodied accounts, which assume the direct reinstatement of low-level motor execution processes during language comprehension. However, these findings suggest that partially shared higher-level representations of intensity may exist between action execution and language processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.