Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807516›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2026

Forensic neuroimaging in childhood abduction, rape and murder case and trial outcome.

Janet Nguyen, Joseph Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janet NguyenDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behaviors, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1295-2238
Joseph WuDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behaviors, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impulse control can be affected by factors including neurological disorders or developmental experiences. As such, a combination of neurodegenerative disorder, neurodevelopmental disorder, and childhood abuse can potentially lead a person to commit violent crimes. In this case report, we discuss the case details, biopsychosocial history, and neuroimaging of 61-year-old Donald Smith who was convicted for kidnapping, sexual assault, and murder of an eight-year-old girl. Using quantitative volumetric analysis, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, and diffusion tensor imaging, we found neurologic evidence consistent with traumatic encephalopathy syndrome, autism spectrum disorder and neurological sequelae of adverse childhood experiences, which aligned with Smith's neuropsychiatric testing and reported personal and medical history. Although evidence of neurological structural abnormalities has influenced mitigations in previous homicide trials, in this case, Smith was sentenced to death. We explore neurological underpinnings that could have led to his deviant behaviour, along with a discussion regarding reasons behind the final verdict.

Indexed as

adverse childhood experiencesautism spectrum disorderdiffusion tensor imagingNeurolawpaediatric sex offenderpositron emission tomographytraumatic encephalopathy syndrome

Identifiers

PMID42807516
PMCPMC13618166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.