Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807497›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2026

Better than clairvoyance? Exploratory results on predictors of regular release, substance use and re-delinquency after forensic addiction treatment.

Jan Querengässer, Adelheid Bezzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jan QuerengässerInstitute for Quality Management in the Forensic Treatment System in Bavaria, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-1252
Adelheid BezzelInstitute for Quality Management in the Forensic Treatment System in Bavaria, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7191-865X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic addiction treatment (FAT) aims to reduce the risk of offences originating in substance use. Hence, reoffending is a key outcome criterion besides therapy completion and substance use. Previous research on success prognoses resulted in heterogeneous sets of predictors. This is the first study to exploratorily investigate three types of predictors and to compare their predictive values on three outcome criteria by using a coherent, multi-centric database. Data from 4,201 patients released from German FAT were used, testing 182 variables. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were computed. Resulting predictor sets were widely heterogeneous. While regular release could satisfactorily be predicted by historical variables only, variance explanation was much lower for substance use and re-delinquency. Including treatment-related and post-treatment variables raised variance explanation up to

Indexed as

forensic hospitallogistic regressionoffender treatmentoutcome researchpsychiatrysubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID42807497
PMCPMC13618185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.