ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Predictors of osteoporosis self-efficacy among young and middle-aged female nurses based on self-efficacy theory and the health belief model: evidence from a tertiary hospital in Eastern China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Young and middle-aged female nurses face an elevated risk of osteoporosis due to occupational demands and progressive physiological bone loss. However, most existing studies focus on postmenopausal women, and the status of objective and self-perceived osteoporosis risk, knowledge, self-efficacy, and its influencing factors among young and middle-aged female nurses remains unclear. Method: A cross-sectional design was used. From August to September 2025, 380female nurses at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, a 4,000-bed tertiary referral centre, were invited to participate, and 369 completed valid questionnaires, forming the final sample. Spearman correlation analysis assessed the relationships between osteoporosis self-efficacy and both osteoporosis knowledge and objective osteoporosis risk among young and middle-aged female nurses. Multiple linear regression analysis was then performed to identify factors influencing osteoporosis self-efficacy. Additionally, exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted stratified by menopausal status and osteoporosis training experience to examine potential effect modifications. Result: The mean osteoporosis self-efficacy score was 52.53 ± 18.45, suggesting suboptimal confidence in preventive behaviors. A high proportion of nurses (63.41%) had objective osteoporosis risk, yet 35.50% underestimated their personal risk. Multiple linear regression showed that menopausal status, objective osteoporosis risk, osteoporosis knowledge, osteoporosis-related training, and milk consumption frequency were significant predictors of self-efficacy, explaining 18.40% of the variance (R Conclusion: Young and middle-aged female nurses face high objective osteoporosis risk but exhibit inaccurate risk perception and suboptimal self-efficacy. The mechanism underlying osteoporosis self-efficacy among young and middle-aged female nurses is complex and may be influenced by menopausal status and training experience. Occupational health departments should provide early osteoporosis screening for these nurses to enhance their risk awareness. Furthermore, differentiated, stratified interventions should be implemented: for trained and postmenopausal nurses, efforts should focus on reinforcing motivation and sustaining high levels of health behaviors rather than reiterating foundational knowledge; for untrained and premenopausal nurses, emphasis should be placed on osteoporosis education and the development of basic health habits, thereby establishing an initial foundation for self-efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.