ArticleInternational journal of transgender health2026
Evaluating vaccine hesitancy in transgender and gender diverse patients at a gender-affirming clinic in New Mexico, USA.
Article in International journal of transgender health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated vaccine hesitancy (VH) scores in transgender and gender-diverse patients for four vaccines: human papillomavirus (HPV), hepatitis B (HBV), influenza, and COVID-19. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a gender-affirming care clinic in New Mexico, USA. Participants aged >18 years with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria were eligible for inclusion. Participants completed an electronic survey during their clinic visit. Demographic characteristics were collected, and additional survey items were adapted from the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale developed by the SAGE Working Group. Higher VH scores indicated greater hesitancy. Results: 181 participants completed surveys. The mean age was 30.0 years and the majority of participants were white (64.1%). Gender was reported as male (39.8%), female (31.5%), non-binary/non-conforming (24.3%), and prefer not to respond (4.4%). Vaccination rates were: COVID-19 (92.8%), influenza (74.0%), HBV (65.7%), and HPV (61.4%). For all vaccines, overall VH scores were higher ( Conclusion: Survey responses from unvaccinated participants indicate a higher degree of VH compared to vaccinated participants. Differing VH determinants were associated with unvaccinated status for the HPV, HBV, influenza, and COVID-19 vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.