ArticleInternational journal of transgender health2026
"I feel under attack": Transgender pre- and adolescents and caregivers opposition to restrictions on gender-affirming medical care in Brazil.
Article in International journal of transgender health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: In April 2025, Brazil's Federal Council of Medicine (CFM) issued Resolution 2.427/2025 banning puberty blockers, restricting hormone therapy until age 18, and delaying gender-affirming surgeries until age 21. These measures sharply contrast with previous national protocols aligned with international standards of care. We conducted a qualitative study to explore how transgender adolescents and their caregivers perceive these new restrictions. Methods: Nine focus groups were held between May and June 2025 with 5 pre-adolescents and 26 adolescents (11-18 years) and 21 caregivers receiving care at Brazil's largest gender identity outpatient clinic. Discussions were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Participants consistently viewed the resolution as unjust, ideologically motivated, and detached from scientific evidence. Adolescents described puberty blockers and hormone therapy as life-saving, emphasizing their positive physical and psychological effects. They rejected detransition as a valid justification for restrictions, framing it as rare and often driven by external pressures. Caregivers echoed these concerns, describing the resolution as harmful, unscientific, and likely to exacerbate inequalities, mental health challenges, and unsafe self-medication practices. Both groups highlighted that gender-affirming care is preceded by long-term, multidisciplinary follow-up under robust clinical protocols, minimizing risks of regret or adverse outcomes. Conclusion: Findings show that restrictive policies are not perceived as neutral regulation but as an assault on the rights, health, and dignity of transgender youth. By amplifying the lived experiences of adolescents and caregivers, this study points out the urgent need for evidence-based, inclusive, and participatory health policies that do not exclude trans voices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.