Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42807413›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Urban health performance configurations in Chinese cities: longitudinal fsQCA, 2019-2024.

Donghai Ye, Juan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Donghai YeSchool of Physical Education, Weifang University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Juan WangSchool of Physical Education and Health, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Composite city indices can rank urban health but rarely explain which conjunctions of public provision, economic capacity, resident action, and environmental conditions are sufficient, whether those conjunctions persist, or how cities move between them over time. This study addresses this configurational and temporal gap using longitudinal evidence from Chinese cities. Methods: We analyzed a balanced panel of 296 Chinese cities from 2019 to 2024, comprising 1,776 city-year observations. Urban health utility (HR), derived from the Tsinghua Urban Health Index (TUHI), was used as the outcome, while government health services (HS), health infrastructure (HI), health industry (HP), health behavior (HA), and health environment (HE) were treated as conditions. Longitudinal fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was conducted using pooled calibration anchors, supplemented by annual models, pooled/between-year/within-city diagnostics, dominant-configuration transitions, robustness analyses, and a 1-year lag model. Results: No single condition met the necessity-consistency threshold of 0.90. Two sufficient configurations for high HR were identified: ~HS Discussion: High urban health performance is associated with multiple sufficient configurations rather than a single necessary condition. The longitudinal strategy distinguishes recurring configurational relations from changing city membership over time and supports differentiated policy portfolios while retaining environmental safeguards. These findings represent set-theoretic associations rather than causal effects.

Indexed as

Urban HealthChinaCitiesFuzzy LogicHealth BehaviorHumansLongitudinal StudiesPublic Health InfrastructureChina.city sustainabilityfuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysislongitudinal configurationssustainable urban health

Identifiers

PMID42807413
PMCPMC13617034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.