ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Adaptive teaching assistance model combining generative AI and big data analytics.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of personalized teaching resources and real-time evaluation in music education severely limits teaching effectiveness and cannot meet the diverse artistic expression needs of learners. Therefore, this paper proposes an adaptive teaching assistance model that combines generative artificial intelligence with big data analysis. This paper uses a cross modal transformer (CMT) to align performance audio with symbol score features, and employs a Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) reinforcement learning framework to convert learners' performance features into reward signals to generate dynamic content. At the same time, this paper conducted a quasi experimental technical validation for 12 weeks, involving 120 undergraduate students majoring in music (60 experimental students and 60 control students); the experimental group received feedback generated by the system, while the control group received traditional guidance. The results showed that the peak cosine similarity between the generated practice trajectory and the skill level of learners at the primary difficulty level was 0.962 ± 0.014, and the system's error detection recall rate for complex rhythm errors was 91.2% ± 1.8%. After 300 training iterations, the cumulative expected return of the PPO mechanism remained stable at 95.12 ± 1.23 (average~0.79 per step). The learning trajectory of the experimental group was significantly steeper than that of the control group, as evidenced by the significant group time interaction [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.