ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Prediction of moderate-to-severe postoperative thirst in general anesthesia patients based on automated machine learning and clinical nursing translation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an Automated Machine Learning (AutoML)-based model for screening Moderate-to-Severe Postoperative Thirst (MSPOT) risk at surgery-to-PACU handover and a prototype clinical decision support system. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort included 928 patients undergoing general anesthesia (training set: Results: In the held-out internal test set, the AutoML model achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.9053, PR-AUC of 0.9080, and Brier score of 0.129, outperforming conventional models. DCA showed greater net benefit across thresholds of 1%-95%. In same-center temporal validation, discrimination remained acceptable (ROC-AUC: 0.8807; PR-AUC: 0.8778), but calibration deteriorated (Brier score: 0.1924; intercept: -1.2250; slope: 0.5811), indicating average risk overestimation and overly extreme probabilities. Six predictors were identified: esmolol use, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, ASA classification, ERAS, and intraoperative fluid volume. Conclusions: The AutoML model showed strong discrimination and transparent feature attribution. The prototype illustrates its potential use at PACU handover to prioritize early assessment and comfort-oriented thirst management. However, temporal miscalibration indicates that individualized probabilities are not ready for clinical decision-making without recalibration and subsequent prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.